Linkin Park’s singles often inspire the question “haven’t they already written this song?” An mp3 that does the rounds from time to time mixes Numb (on the left) and Pushing Me Away (on the right) to illustrate this with almost comical effect: All Linken Park Songs Sound Exactly The Same.
As shown below, and forgive the hyperbole, much more than they sound the same all Linkin Park songs look the same. And while it’s easy to criticize the band for their overuse of a formula that’s by now cliche, the similarity between their tracks at least holds a lesson on the importance of song arrangement in pop music production.
The Linkin Park Formula
The standard Linkin Park structure looks like this:
- Quiet intro: Each song has a relatively quiet two-measure intro.
- The instrumental kicker: The full band come in together on the down-beat, and play two or four high energy measures, usually instrumental.
- Quiet verse: The song eases off for a verse or two, heightening the dynamic contrast between the song’s sections.
- Heavy chorus: Usually the same chords established in the kicker, with Chester screaming over top for added emotion.
Here’s how it “looks” in practice. Each image below shows the audio level in (roughly) the first 90 seconds of a Linkin Park song. Note that I adjusted the tempo of a few tracks for better visual alignment:
If the pattern isn’t clear to you, mouse-over each image to highlight the 4 sections: Intro, kicker, verse, chorus. And click the title to hear the song on Youtube.
There’s nothing particularly surprising or innovative about the structure. But its repeated use by Linkin Park is clearly successful: They’re one of a few acts still selling lots of CDs.
Why It Works
There are several reasons why this song formula works, and whether or not you record pop music, understanding the reasons will make you a better producer:
Dynamic contrast: Our senses are drawn to change (remember why we listen to reference tracks while mixing?) so we find dynamic, evolving sounds more interesting. The up-and-down of a typical Linkin Park song grabs listeners’ attention on an instinctive level.
Memorable hooks: Because it’s often jarring, the kicker at the start of Linkin Park’s songs is memorable, and makes for a great hook. Pop songs hit or miss mainly on the effectiveness of their hooks.
Familiarity: For lovers, it breeds contempt. For pop music artists, familiarity breeds fans. It’s a truism in the traditional music industry that to succeed, a band needs a “sound.” Linkin Park’s re-use of the same basic song structure makes their music instantly recognizable, and lets their listeners feel immediately comfortable with new material.
Again, you may not write or record pop music. You may even despise the stuff. But knowing why a band would choose to re-use a formula like this will help you make better decisions about your own song arrangements (even if only to avoid having your music compared to Linkin Park.)
Cheap Gimmick?
What does this say about Linkin Park’s music?
On one hand, the band and their producers deserve kudos for finding and exploiting a successful formula. They’re in the entertainment business, after all, and appealing to fans is any entertainer’s number one job.
On the other hand, it’s hard not to view the six images above as a statement on the music industry. The major labels decry the actions of listeners who download music from free sources. But this is the alternative they offer: The same song, repackaged six different ways. The vast majority of music listeners who aren’t Linkin Park fans ask the same question I did in the first sentence, “Haven’t they already written this song?” And the obvious follow-up question, “Why would I pay for it more than once?”
For more indie artist and home recording tips,
Subscribe to the Hometracked feed, or receive email updates.
271 comments
Trackback URI Comments feed for this article
i’m sure you would get similar results if you illustrated rap, punk, country, etc songs….look at all those terrible “hardcore” screamo bands…its all garbage and if drawn out like above it would look like one long line of loud garbage….country would prob look like a d*ck cause its real gay
dugg.
It’s interesting…people have criticized Minutes to Midnight because it was different from Linkin Park’s earlier stuff, but I think the new album, for the most part, completely gets rid of the formula you’re going on about. Take songs like Bleed it Out and Leave out All the Rest for instance. Or In Pieces, or The Little Things Give you Away, or pretty much all the songs on the album with the exception of What I’ve Done.
The structure of the music although repetitive and boring is of very little importance to the fans. the OP is right on with the statement made about finding a niche that works and sticking to it. Most people don’t have the mental capacity to notice these kinds of things. When you are talking about music even if you think its brand new it has been done before and you are just producing a variation on tempo and lyrics for the most part (at least if your music fits into a larger classification like pop music or even worse country).
But as has already been said LP is probably the BEST example of overuse of a single theme not only do their songs all sound the same with exception of the newer album they also provoke the same response from me: nausea.
I dont like LP or any other band that has that particular sound BECAUSE it sounds the same to me. Ozzy was original the Beatles were original Nirvana like it or not was the band that made grunge popular and the most stand out band of the genre even Metallica is easily distinguishable from other bands of their genre although they are almost as bad as LP for the repetition.
Simply put if your sound isn’t different it isnt worth my time because I’ve already heard it.
I like how this article links the song structure to the economic structure of a corporation which of course is correct.
in the abstract you could say the corporation really has stamped the music.
Visually and acoustically.
very good article and remember people this is about being creative, although I must say the formula of contrast can be infinitely different also so contrast it’s self is in no way being judged here.
also no, Nirvana songs don’t all follow the same format they have a stamped style but it was more built around similar hooks Kurt saw this i think as a real thorn which is why in the end they moved towards the whole un-plugged thing (remember that , wow).with the meat puppets and such.
with the shift towards something like what the White stripes might do now.
who knows where it would have gone from there?
that’s why i listen to music to see the development if it’s not there then what’s the point???? i.e the end of the original article comments.
Great article.
linkin park is the greatest band ever! just listen to the damn songs and shut the fuck up!!!
Huh?same sound?! linkin park is the most creative band ever.for this just I mean JUST listen to pushing me away and its REMIX p5hng me a*wy(reanimation or texas version).
yes its the same track and 90% same lyric but the difference will blow your head off.(u’ll adore the remix!!)
and for those who never worked with some shit like graphical tempo: all genres have its same picture JUST try it!
hey i think most of the ppl here don know even a bit about LP
they do ROCK,RAP,PUNK,TECHNO,POP….
Which band i mean in all genres has the variety of linkin park?
for example in meteora (2nd album)we have some massive tracks like faint and dont stay and some different stuff like “breaking the habit” and “session”
and “nobodys listening”(with a japanese flute)so why there is no picture of them Huh? LOOSER
fuck linkin park you bitch ass crazy fans
hey i dont like linkin park i dont care about them .but for god sake just look at GOOGLE MUSIC TRENDS 6 of 20 top music is LINKIN PARK!!!!
minutes to midnite kinda strays from that formula, and what does linkin park get? a lot of hate from fans becoz they didnt make songs that sounded like the 2 earlier albums. what can they do huh?
Hahahahahahahahaha, hahaahahahaha! At this point in the comments, it’s the only thing to say really, I mean, holy shit, hahahahaha!
Personally, i dont like the way they structure the songs. Everyone else does, so i dont have much of an impact. Its all structured the same, sure they may throw in a new key in the songs…but that leaves the meter to be the same for every single song. Idk about all of you, but 4/4 pattern gets quite old. Linkin Park is just a huge mainstream band to me, sure they sound nice, but it really is the same old thing
BULL****!!! Whoever wrote this artical doesnt know piss all about LP if you take any band you will find the same results… from the examples above they selected the Biased Information.. If you take any other band and try hard enough you WILL find the same results..
And so what take KoRn they always had and have the same style and i respect that.. linkin park never kept the same style only Hybrid Theory and Meteora have the same Genre..
I mean cmon how much do you know about these guys.. how many CDs do you think they have made.. 5? 6?… right?… wrong!! 14 CDs (at least)! [not including the bands Chesters (grey Daze) and Mikes(Xero) were in previous to LP or Mikes X-ecutioners]…
Give these Ledgends a F****** break -_-”
The comment earlier about metallica rehashing their same songs is correct, but at least they have the decency to name them Song Title 2 instead of trying to hide the fact that its a rehash.
This is pretty funny overall, and even more interesting when you look at the difference between the LP fans that commented and the rest of the people. Grammar much LP fans? “The song is like, totalalaly differnt cuz ther is a japeanisian flute in it!”
Ahh yes, the reality of the article was good enough, but the fans just MADE MY DAY. Thanks guys!
this could easily be done with the ramones or nirvana. I had no idead that Lincoln park only had 6 songs….amazing.
who cares if a band has a song structure that they like to use more than once?
LMFAO !!!!!!!
Linkin Park is not good music.
More Comments: ‹ Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · … · 11 · Next ›