<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vocal EQ Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/</link>
	<description>Home recording and project studio blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-76060</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/#comment-76060</guid>
		<description>I kind of like a little high-shelf from 5khz and up, by a couple db as well, and a db of 3khz (about one octave width, on the lead singer only), in addition to what Des mentions. Not as a general rule, mind you, just something to try.

The high shelf seems to bring out the &quot;air&quot; a bit, but is dangerous with regard to making the S&#039;s sound louder and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of like a little high-shelf from 5khz and up, by a couple db as well, and a db of 3khz (about one octave width, on the lead singer only), in addition to what Des mentions. Not as a general rule, mind you, just something to try.</p>
<p>The high shelf seems to bring out the &#8220;air&#8221; a bit, but is dangerous with regard to making the S&#8217;s sound louder and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Stathopoulos</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-67517</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Stathopoulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/#comment-67517</guid>
		<description>I have tried your hi-pass filter advice and using the bypass button, it definetely makes the vocals sound clear and I also feel it makes it fit in better with the music. I have also tried the filter on other instruments and I have noticed that the mix in general is more clear. Thanks for the interersting above article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried your hi-pass filter advice and using the bypass button, it definetely makes the vocals sound clear and I also feel it makes it fit in better with the music. I have also tried the filter on other instruments and I have noticed that the mix in general is more clear. Thanks for the interersting above article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josef Motley</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-66157</link>
		<dc:creator>Josef Motley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 20:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/#comment-66157</guid>
		<description>i record fairly fast rapping-based sort of music and i really really need good plugins for de-essing. i&#039;m going to try the spitfish as recommended here. at the moment i have fairly shit mics / ports / leads or maybe only one of those, but either way i have to run at bare minimum a compressor, a de-esser, and noise reduction on every vocal track i record. as i&#039;m pretty short of cash for new equipment i have found some primitive methods such as singing down into the mic have done wonders for getting better raw takes without so much siblance. i find as well subtly tweaking the EQ on small patches of siblance can be helpful too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i record fairly fast rapping-based sort of music and i really really need good plugins for de-essing. i&#8217;m going to try the spitfish as recommended here. at the moment i have fairly shit mics / ports / leads or maybe only one of those, but either way i have to run at bare minimum a compressor, a de-esser, and noise reduction on every vocal track i record. as i&#8217;m pretty short of cash for new equipment i have found some primitive methods such as singing down into the mic have done wonders for getting better raw takes without so much siblance. i find as well subtly tweaking the EQ on small patches of siblance can be helpful too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recording Review</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-56138</link>
		<dc:creator>Recording Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/#comment-56138</guid>
		<description>I would like to add that very dynamic performances, I typically use subtle parametric EQ and more aggressive multi-band EQ to control various words and phrases that have dramatically different frequency responses.  

I find the 2-3K area has a way of leaping out on certain words on loud singers and a multi-band is my preferred tool for capturing that.

Brandon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to add that very dynamic performances, I typically use subtle parametric EQ and more aggressive multi-band EQ to control various words and phrases that have dramatically different frequency responses.  </p>
<p>I find the 2-3K area has a way of leaping out on certain words on loud singers and a multi-band is my preferred tool for capturing that.</p>
<p>Brandon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-55347</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/#comment-55347</guid>
		<description>Always a good idea to bypass the EQ and give it a listen for what is really necessary. I know i&#039;m guilty of going with &#039;what always works&#039; when it may need some tweaks.

Good stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always a good idea to bypass the EQ and give it a listen for what is really necessary. I know i&#8217;m guilty of going with &#8216;what always works&#8217; when it may need some tweaks.</p>
<p>Good stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-46471</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/#comment-46471</guid>
		<description>Good Post. I often find that my vocal recordings have a very &quot;nasal&quot; sound, and cutting around 1Hz is a good suggestion. Most of the time this can be corrected by changing how I hold my head while singing... making sure my chin/head is level instead of facing down. This also helps to get rid of the &quot;kermit the frog&quot; effect lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Post. I often find that my vocal recordings have a very &#8220;nasal&#8221; sound, and cutting around 1Hz is a good suggestion. Most of the time this can be corrected by changing how I hold my head while singing&#8230; making sure my chin/head is level instead of facing down. This also helps to get rid of the &#8220;kermit the frog&#8221; effect lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: des</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-43197</link>
		<dc:creator>des</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/#comment-43197</guid>
		<description>Thanks Matt &amp; Todd!

[@Todd] &gt; &lt;em&gt;It&#039;s amazing how the same vocal source and mic can present different eq and mix challenges from song to song. &lt;/em&gt;

No question! But then, if it was easy, it wouldn&#039;t be very much fun :-)

[@Matt] &gt; &lt;em&gt;If the fundamental frequency is 125, why would we roll off up to 180 ?&lt;/em&gt;

I could have emphasized the words &quot;average&quot; and &quot;often.&quot; As in, the &lt;strong&gt;average&lt;/strong&gt; fundamental frequency is 125Hz, but &lt;strong&gt;often&lt;/strong&gt; you can go all the way up to about 180Hz.

Some voices have more low-frequency energy than others. The key is to recognize that while many male singers never go below 125Hz (roughly low B,) a lot of voices won&#039;t get anywhere near that low. And the more low frequencies you remove from a vocal track, the less that track will interfere with the bass instruments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Matt &#038; Todd!</p>
<p>[@Todd] > <em>It&#8217;s amazing how the same vocal source and mic can present different eq and mix challenges from song to song. </em></p>
<p>No question! But then, if it was easy, it wouldn&#8217;t be very much fun :-)</p>
<p>[@Matt] > <em>If the fundamental frequency is 125, why would we roll off up to 180 ?</em></p>
<p>I could have emphasized the words &#8220;average&#8221; and &#8220;often.&#8221; As in, the <strong>average</strong> fundamental frequency is 125Hz, but <strong>often</strong> you can go all the way up to about 180Hz.</p>
<p>Some voices have more low-frequency energy than others. The key is to recognize that while many male singers never go below 125Hz (roughly low B,) a lot of voices won&#8217;t get anywhere near that low. And the more low frequencies you remove from a vocal track, the less that track will interfere with the bass instruments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-43140</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/#comment-43140</guid>
		<description>If the fundamental frequency is 125,  why would we roll off up to 180 ?

I&#039;m not clear on this.

(Your blog is awesome, by the way)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the fundamental frequency is 125,  why would we roll off up to 180 ?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not clear on this.</p>
<p>(Your blog is awesome, by the way)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-42941</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/#comment-42941</guid>
		<description>Great tips.  I&#039;m not a pro sound engineer, so these specific eq tips will be a huge reference point for me in my home recording adventures.  It&#039;s amazing how the same vocal source and mic can present different eq and mix challenges from song to song.  Again, thanks.  This will be a great help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tips.  I&#8217;m not a pro sound engineer, so these specific eq tips will be a huge reference point for me in my home recording adventures.  It&#8217;s amazing how the same vocal source and mic can present different eq and mix challenges from song to song.  Again, thanks.  This will be a great help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Friday Blogroll ControlRoom - Mixin&#8217; it with Dr. J</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-42470</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Friday Blogroll ControlRoom - Mixin&#8217; it with Dr. J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 00:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2008/02/07/vocal-eq-tips/#comment-42470</guid>
		<description>[...] Hometracked shares some Vocal EQ Tips. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hometracked shares some Vocal EQ Tips. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
