<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avoiding inter sample peaks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/</link>
	<description>Home recording and project studio blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam!</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/comment-page-1/#comment-29865</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/#comment-29865</guid>
		<description>Heres a (late) question: if the target format is MP3, does explicitly avoiding inter-sample overs help? The reason I ask is because it was my impression that the mp3 decoding process changes the waveform, introducing new inter-sample overs. Infact the mp3 example you posted, once decoded to wav, actually has &lt;i&gt;regular&lt;/i&gt; overs, which have been induced by the decoding process.

Surely keeping the track out of the red is good advice regardless, but I wonder if having zero inter-sample overs in your mixed down WAV means that an mp3 encoding of that WAV will also be free of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heres a (late) question: if the target format is MP3, does explicitly avoiding inter-sample overs help? The reason I ask is because it was my impression that the mp3 decoding process changes the waveform, introducing new inter-sample overs. Infact the mp3 example you posted, once decoded to wav, actually has <i>regular</i> overs, which have been induced by the decoding process.</p>
<p>Surely keeping the track out of the red is good advice regardless, but I wonder if having zero inter-sample overs in your mixed down WAV means that an mp3 encoding of that WAV will also be free of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: des</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/comment-page-1/#comment-24954</link>
		<dc:creator>des</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/#comment-24954</guid>
		<description>&gt; &lt;em&gt;If it goes above red then I reduce the main volume. &lt;/em&gt;

A sound practice &lt;strong&gt;:-)&lt;/strong&gt;


&gt; &lt;em&gt;I am having a hard time believing they could be as much as 1.0 dB, though.&lt;/em&gt;

The Neilsen/Lund paper that lays out the theory for this shows a contrived example where the inter sample peaks are &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;6dB&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; (!!!) higher than the sampled level.

They go on to say that many mastering engineers agree 3dB is a safe, conservative allowance. (And 1dB, like I said above, is the general consensus on the web, and among my engineer friends.)

Here&#039;s the paper, if you want more details:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tcelectronic.com/media/Level_paper_AES109.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tcelectronic.com/media/Level_paper_AES109.pdf&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> <em>If it goes above red then I reduce the main volume. </em></p>
<p>A sound practice <strong>:-)</strong></p>
<p>> <em>I am having a hard time believing they could be as much as 1.0 dB, though.</em></p>
<p>The Neilsen/Lund paper that lays out the theory for this shows a contrived example where the inter sample peaks are <em><strong>6dB</strong></em> (!!!) higher than the sampled level.</p>
<p>They go on to say that many mastering engineers agree 3dB is a safe, conservative allowance. (And 1dB, like I said above, is the general consensus on the web, and among my engineer friends.)</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the paper, if you want more details:<br />
<a href="http://www.tcelectronic.com/media/Level_paper_AES109.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.tcelectronic.com/media/Level_paper_AES109.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/comment-page-1/#comment-24772</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/#comment-24772</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this, so often I hear digital anomalies. but there are so few explanations as to where they are coming from. I am having a hard time believing they could be as much as 1.0 dB, though.  That is a very large interpolation for any DAC to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, so often I hear digital anomalies. but there are so few explanations as to where they are coming from. I am having a hard time believing they could be as much as 1.0 dB, though.  That is a very large interpolation for any DAC to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kubton</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/comment-page-1/#comment-23436</link>
		<dc:creator>kubton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/#comment-23436</guid>
		<description>Good article.  I fell victim to them.  I lower the levels and they disappeared but never knew why when I never saw clipping on my meters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  I fell victim to them.  I lower the levels and they disappeared but never knew why when I never saw clipping on my meters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abplanet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Avoiding inter sample peaks</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/comment-page-1/#comment-23430</link>
		<dc:creator>abplanet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Avoiding inter sample peaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/#comment-23430</guid>
		<description>[...] sourced here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sourced here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Kastum</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/comment-page-1/#comment-23324</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Kastum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 02:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2007/11/08/prevent-intersample-peaks/#comment-23324</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.. seriously new stuff to me.
I normally just look at those little meter&#039;s. If it goes above red then I reduce the main volume. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.. seriously new stuff to me.<br />
I normally just look at those little meter&#8217;s. If it goes above red then I reduce the main volume. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
