<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The secrets of mixing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hometracked.com/2007/02/27/the-secrets-of-mixing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/02/27/the-secrets-of-mixing/</link>
	<description>Home recording and project studio blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Landrum</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/02/27/the-secrets-of-mixing/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Landrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2007/02/27/the-secrets-of-mixing/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Cool, thanks for the reply. I&#039;ve heard stories about sending &quot;stems&quot; to mastering engineers, usually from old analog-head engineers, and usually told with much vitriol. I spend too much time at ProSoundWeb, methinks. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, thanks for the reply. I&#8217;ve heard stories about sending &#8220;stems&#8221; to mastering engineers, usually from old analog-head engineers, and usually told with much vitriol. I spend too much time at ProSoundWeb, methinks. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: des</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/02/27/the-secrets-of-mixing/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>des</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2007/02/27/the-secrets-of-mixing/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Actually Josh, I totally agree with you. I was surprised when I re-read that quote I grabbed, &#039;cause I could have &lt;em&gt;sworn&lt;/em&gt; he said &quot;use the highest bit rate&quot; (which is a no-brainer.) I&#039;ve done the blind tests, and I can&#039;t tell a meaningful difference between 44.1K and anything higher.

And ya, Darren, separation mastering is something to consider if you&#039;re still unsure of your mixing skills. I think I have some other related links here. I&#039;ll dig them up and post them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Josh, I totally agree with you. I was surprised when I re-read that quote I grabbed, &#8217;cause I could have <em>sworn</em> he said &#8220;use the highest bit rate&#8221; (which is a no-brainer.) I&#8217;ve done the blind tests, and I can&#8217;t tell a meaningful difference between 44.1K and anything higher.</p>
<p>And ya, Darren, separation mastering is something to consider if you&#8217;re still unsure of your mixing skills. I think I have some other related links here. I&#8217;ll dig them up and post them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Landrum</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/02/27/the-secrets-of-mixing/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Landrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2007/02/27/the-secrets-of-mixing/#comment-220</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny, because I was about to ask whether separation mastering really is worthwhile. Well, I have one answer. ;-) Not that I have anything even close to the mastering stage (I&#039;m still building a little studio), but it&#039;s always nice to learn all I can about every aspect of the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny, because I was about to ask whether separation mastering really is worthwhile. Well, I have one answer. ;-) Not that I have anything even close to the mastering stage (I&#8217;m still building a little studio), but it&#8217;s always nice to learn all I can about every aspect of the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Woodward</title>
		<link>http://www.hometracked.com/2007/02/27/the-secrets-of-mixing/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Woodward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometracked.com/2007/02/27/the-secrets-of-mixing/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>I disagree on the 96k+ business. I&#039;d challenge any producer to try to A/B them in a blind test. 24 bit does make a noticible difference, but 96k is only useful if you&#039;re going to be doing pitch manipulation...

I do like the idea of separation mastering, though. It gives the mastering engineer more of a mixing role, but I&#039;ve never been able to understand why everyone looks at mastering as a separate process. Applying anything but compression to the master bus is usually less effective than treating the problem at its source - in the multitrack mixing environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree on the 96k+ business. I&#8217;d challenge any producer to try to A/B them in a blind test. 24 bit does make a noticible difference, but 96k is only useful if you&#8217;re going to be doing pitch manipulation&#8230;</p>
<p>I do like the idea of separation mastering, though. It gives the mastering engineer more of a mixing role, but I&#8217;ve never been able to understand why everyone looks at mastering as a separate process. Applying anything but compression to the master bus is usually less effective than treating the problem at its source &#8211; in the multitrack mixing environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

